In this article, we’re going to discuss: 

• What GDPR’s software compliance standards are—and why most tools fall short.
• Which features matter most for staying compliant without sacrificing visibility.
• How to evaluate consent, storage, and privacy settings in practical terms.
• Which remote work control software actually supports GDPR—and which ones put your business at risk.

‍

Under GDPR, employee monitoring is legal—but only when done with clear limits and safeguards. Without the right controls, standard tracking features can quickly become a compliance risk.

That’s why businesses need employee system monitoring software designed with privacy in mind. Software that includes flexible consent options, access logs, data minimization settings, and secure storage makes it easier to monitor lawfully.

This article compares top employee monitoring platforms based on how well they support GDPR compliance. You’ll see which tools provide the strongest privacy protections, and which offer the flexibility to track activity without putting your company—or your employees—at risk.
‍

What Makes Monitoring Software GDPR-Compliant?

To comply with GDPR, monitoring tools must go beyond tracking activity—they must give businesses control over how data is collected, stored, and used. Not every platform offers these capabilities, and overlooking them can lead to legal and financial consequences.

The most compliant tools offer customizable consent management, allowing businesses to inform employees clearly and gather consent in ways that align with local laws. They support data minimization, so only necessary information is collected and stored. Features like anonymization and pseudonymization reduce risk by separating personal identity from usage data.

Access control is also critical. A compliant platform should provide audit logs, role-based permissions, and traceable user activity to help meet data access requirements. Finally, secure data storage—ideally with EU-based or on-premise hosting—and support for DSAR workflows allow companies to respond to employee data requests quickly and accurately.
‍

Quick Snapshot: GDPR-Readiness of Top Monitoring Tools

Below is an employee monitoring software list of five leading tools for comparison. The list highlights how each platform supports key GDPR requirements—from consent and anonymization to data storage and access control. This overview shows that while several tools offer partial support, only a few deliver the full set of features needed for GDPR compliance.

Let's break down each category to show where the differences matter most:
‍

Consent Management & Transparency

To meet GDPR standards, monitoring must be lawful, transparent, and limited to what’s necessary. Consent isn’t always required—but when it is, software should support it with flexible, built-in options.
‍

Insightful

Insightful provides customizable consent notices, localized templates, and an employee-facing dashboard. You can tailor settings by team or role and choose visible or silent modes based on your legal basis. This flexibility makes it easy to adapt to local regulations across the EU.
‍

ActivTrak

ActivTrak includes basic consent banners and user notifications. However, it lacks customizable templates, legal policy support, or consent logging—making it less suitable for complex compliance needs.
‍

Teramind

Teramind supports consent documentation and policy customization. It offers flexibility in how monitoring is configured, but defaults to stealth mode, which may require extra legal justification under GDPR.
‍

Hubstaff

Hubstaff assumes implied consent through software use. It provides limited control over how consent is displayed and doesn’t offer formal consent tracking or customizable notices.
‍

Controlio

Controlio does not provide any consent options and defaults to stealth monitoring. Without external legal policies or contracts in place, this may present a high compliance risk under GDPR.
‍

Anonymization & Privacy Controls

GDPR encourages businesses to reduce risk by using anonymization or pseudonymization where possible. These features help protect personal identity while still allowing teams to analyze trends and performance.
‍

Insightful

Insightful offers optional anonymized views that hide individual names while preserving team- or role-level trends. This allows managers to track performance patterns without tying data to specific employees—ideal for early-stage analysis or privacy-sensitive use cases.
‍

ActivTrak

ActivTrak does not support anonymization. All user activity is tied to individual identities, which limits flexibility in privacy-first environments.
‍

Teramind

Teramind supports pseudonymization in certain configurations. While not fully anonymized, this feature helps reduce exposure by masking identity in activity reports.
‍

Hubstaff

Hubstaff tracks all user data with full identity visible. It does not include anonymization or pseudonymization options, making all data personally identifiable by default.
‍

Controlio

Controlio does not offer any anonymization or identity-masking features. All monitoring data is directly linked to named users.
‍

Audit Logs, Access Control & Data Requests

GDPR requires businesses to control who can access personal data and to maintain clear records of how that data is used. Monitoring software must support audit logs, role-based permissions, and employee data access—especially for handling data subject access requests (DSARs).
‍

Insightful

Insightful provides detailed audit logs that track all access to user data. Permissions can be set by role, and managers can limit visibility by team or function. Employees can view their own data and request deletion, supporting full DSAR workflows.
‍

ActivTrak

ActivTrak includes basic access logs and role-based permissions. It allows employees to view some of their activity data but does not support deletion requests or audit trails with full granularity.
‍

Teramind

Teramind offers extensive logging and forensic-level auditing. It supports strict access control by role and can generate detailed reports on data use. However, it does not give employees access to their own data or tools to manage DSARs.
‍

Hubstaff

Hubstaff offers limited access controls and no robust audit logging. Employees can view their time logs but cannot request deletion or manage access rights. DSAR support is not built in.
‍

Controlio

Controlio provides minimal access control and logging. Employees cannot view or manage their data, and there is no built-in support for access or deletion requests.
‍

Data Storage & Security Standards

GDPR requires that personal data be stored securely and, when possible, within the EU. Businesses must also ensure proper encryption, access controls, and safeguards against unauthorized access—especially when using third-party software.
‍

Insightful

Insightful offers both EU-based cloud hosting and on-premise deployment. All data is encrypted in transit and at rest. The platform is certified under SOC 2 and ISO 27001, meeting strict international security standards.
‍

ActivTrak

ActivTrak uses U.S.-based cloud storage with no option for EU-only data residency. While the platform offers standard encryption and SOC 2 compliance, it lacks the geographic flexibility many GDPR-focused companies require.
‍

Teramind

Teramind supports both cloud and on-premise deployments, with EU data centers available. It offers strong encryption and customizable security policies, making it a solid option for businesses with stricter storage requirements.
‍

Hubstaff

Hubstaff stores data in the cloud but does not clearly state whether EU residency is available. It provides standard encryption but lacks formal certifications like ISO 27001. On-premise deployment is not available.
‍

Controlio

Controlio claims to support EU-based storage and offers an on-premise option. However, details on encryption standards and certifications are limited, and public documentation lacks clarity on security practices.
‍

Employee Rights & Self-Access

Under GDPR, employees have the right to access their personal data, understand how it’s used, and request corrections or deletion. Monitoring tools should support these rights with transparent, user-facing features.
‍

Insightful

Insightful allows employees to view their activity data through a dedicated dashboard. Admins can process deletion requests and export data as part of a DSAR. These features help organizations meet GDPR obligations quickly and confidently.
‍

ActivTrak

ActivTrak provides employees with limited visibility into their own data but does not support deletion requests or DSAR automation. Self-access is available but basic.
‍

Teramind

Teramind does not offer employee dashboards or self-access tools. All data is visible only to administrators, and employees cannot request changes or deletion through the platform.
‍

Hubstaff

Hubstaff allows users to view their own time logs but lacks any tools for deletion or data control. DSAR support must be handled manually outside the platform.
‍

Controlio

Controlio does not support employee access, visibility, or deletion features. All monitoring data is visible only to administrators, with no self-service options.

‍

Data Minimization & Monitoring Controls

GDPR requires that personal data collection be limited to what’s necessary. Monitoring tools should allow businesses to customize what is tracked, who sees it, and when it’s collected—avoiding blanket, always-on surveillance.
‍

Insightful

Insightful offers granular control over what’s monitored, by team, role, or application type. You can disable features like  computer screen monitoring, set work-hour limits, and customize visibility to align with internal policies and legal requirements.
‍

ActivTrak

ActivTrak allows some customization, such as disabling specific tracking features. However, its controls are limited compared to more configurable platforms. Data minimization is possible but not deeply customizable.
‍

Teramind

Teramind supports detailed tracking rules and policies, including application-level and user-specific settings. Admins can define exactly what is recorded, making it suitable for strict compliance environments.
‍

Hubstaff

Hubstaff provides only basic control over screenshots and activity tracking. There’s little flexibility to reduce data collection beyond surface-level settings.
‍

Controlio

Controlio applies always-on tracking by default. Monitoring cannot be adjusted without manual configuration outside the platform. There are no built-in controls to limit what data is collected.
‍

Why Insightful Stands Out

Among the tools compared, Insightful offers the most complete and flexible support for GDPR compliance. It combines advanced monitoring capabilities with privacy-first controls that help businesses stay compliant without sacrificing oversight.

Insightful gives you full control over what’s tracked, how it’s stored, and who can access it. You can customize consent notices, enable anonymized reporting, and meet DSAR requests with built-in tools. With both EU cloud hosting and on-premise deployment, it adapts to even the most demanding compliance policies.

Unlike platforms that rely on stealth-only tracking or offer limited data controls, Insightful makes compliance a core feature—not an afterthought. It’s built for organizations that need transparency, accountability, and data protection in every workflow.

Start a 7-day free trial or book a demo to see how Insightful helps you monitor legally, securely, and responsibly.

‍

‍