Workpuls Teramind ActivTrak Hubstaff DeskTime Time Doctor RescueTime Kickidler Veriato Work Examiner
OVERVIEW
Price $6/user/month $6/user/month $7.20/user/month $7/user/month $7/user/month $9.99/user/month $6/user/month $9.99/user/month $150/licence/year $60/licence (lifetime)
Free trial 7 days 7 days No 14 days 14 days 14 days 30 days 7 days Yes 30 days
Ease of use Very easy Difficult Very easy Easy Easy Very easy Very easy Very easy Very difficult Easy
TRACKING METHODS
Unlimited (tracker working 24/7)
Fixed (defined working hours)
Automatic (when computer is connected to a specified network)
Manual (start/stop)
Project based (track time only on projects)
GENERAL MONITORING FEATURES
Stealth mode
App and website usage
Real-time monitoring
Offline time tracking
Attendance
Activity levels
Keylogger
Geolocation
Remote desktop control
Website/activity blocking
SCREENSHOTS AND RECORDING
Screenshots
Screenshots on demand
Screen recording
PRODUCTIVITY FEATURES
Productivity trends
Websites and apps labeling
Category labeling
Productivity alerts
ADVANCED SECURITY FEATURES
User behavior analytics
Data loss prevention
Advanced file and web monitoring
REPORTING
Productivity reports
Team reports
Timelines
Email reports
Access management
PLATFORMS
Web
Mac desktop app
Windows desktop app
Linux desktop app
Mobile app iOS, Android iOS, Android iOS, Android iOS, Android iOS, Android Android
Browser extension Chrome Chrome Chrome
Other Citrix, VMware Chrome OS
OTHER
Support Phone, email, online Phone, email, online Phone, email, online Email, online Phone, email, online, in-person Online Phone, email, online Email, online, Viber, Whatsapp Phone, email, online, support ticket Phone, email, online
Knowledge base
Video tutorials
Integrations comming soon
API
Deployment cloud, on-premise cloud, on-premise, AWS, Azure cloud cloud cloud cloud cloud on-premise cloud, on-premise on-premise
Kronos Humanity Timeclockplus Tsheets Wheniwork Deputy Replicon Jibble EbilityTimeTracker OnTheClock BeeBole
OVERVIEW
Price(per month)Available upon requestFrom $2 per userAvailable upon requestFrom $6.40 per user+$16Free for up to 75 usersFrom $2.50 per userBasic plan:$30 for 5 users+$5 per additional userFrom $1.50 per employeeFrom $4 per user+$8From $2.20 per user$5.99 per user per month
Free trial30 days14 daysYes14 days14 days14 days30 days30 days,no credit card required
Ease of useDifficultEasyDifficultVery easyEasyEasyDifficultVery easyEasyEasyEasy
FEATURES
Timecard management
Scheduling
Shift Trading
Timesheets
Break time management
Real-time tracking
PTO Management
Payroll
Invoicing
Client billing
GPS tracking
Clock out reminders
Alerts
Manual time
PUNCH-IN METHODS
Web app
Mobile app
Time clock device
Time clock kiosk
Facial recognition
Fingerprint scanning
Geofencing
Group punch-in
REPORTING
Visual reports
Email reports
Time rounding
MANAGEMENT
Permissions
Manager approvals
Add time for others
Integrations
PLATFORMS
Web
Android app
iOS app
Mac desktop app
Windows desktop app
Linux desktop app
OTHER
SupportPhone and onlinePhone and onlinePhone,chat and onlinePhone and chatEmail and onlineChat and phonePhone,email,chat and onlinePhone and onlinePhone,email,chat and onlinePhone and onlineOnline chat and video support in English,French,and Spanish
Knowledge base
Video tutorials
Community forum
API

Embrace automation to make your productivity reporting processes more effective and objective.

Productivity reports are a bottom-line necessity for successfully managing your workforce. Leaders, managers, and stakeholders need clear data on how employees handle the workloads given to them.


Prior to today’s digitally-enabled, hyper-connected work environment, productivity reporting was a time-consuming manual process. Analog punch clocks were considered effective employee performance tracking tools, and employees would clock in and out every single day.


Now, organizations have a wide variety of work tracking software options available, but a surprising number of leaders still rely on intuition and subjective monthly or annual assessments to gauge productivity.


At the same time, enterprises have radically upgraded their technological infrastructure in other areas of the business. Digital transformation has led to incredible improvements in workplace efficiency. It’s time productivity reporting made the jump, too.


Not All Productivity Metrics are Equal

There are many different ways to measure productivity, depending on the type of work being done. In some cases it’s even possible to measure the same kind of work in different ways, and the choices you make can deeply impact your eventual reporting capabilities.


Let’s take a developer, for example. Some of the ways that organizations traditionally measure a developer’s productive output include:


  • Number of Commits
  • Lines of code written
  • Number of pull requests made
  • Number of velocity points achieved
  • “Impact”


All of these measurements have their advantages and drawbacks. For example: 


  • Measuring by commits incentivizes developers to work quickly, but that can lead to bugs and errors that would otherwise have been caught before they were introduced into the system.
  • Measuring developer productivity by lines of code written is good for determining the size of your software system and understanding how the codebase is changing, but encourages developers to write large, unwieldy applications in inefficient ways.
  • Measuring productivity by pull requests encourages developers to think small, since this metric doesn’t factor the size or effort required. Developers may start prioritizing small, easy-to-code features over large, strategic core functionalities.
  • Velocity point requirements require managers to size projects before the work is completed, which makes it imprecise. This undermines the utility of estimating project value in the first place, since developers will earn based on the estimate, rather than the finished job.
  • Impact is difficult to define and measure at an organizational level or across organizations. One team may define “impact” differently than another.


Despite the challenges it represents, impact remains the best option for accurately assessing the value of employee productivity. In order to get it right, managers must establish the right metrics from the start and then deploy technology that automates the challenging and time-consuming process of granular, personalized productivity reporting across large teams.

Establish Productivity Metrics That Truly Measure Impact

The concept behind measuring “impact” is a good one, but it’s difficult to do without using automated work tracking software. This is because the average employee monitoring tool doesn’t gather or provide enough data to make “impact” a measurable performance indicator.


The ideal impact of any employee’s work refers to the actual dollar-value of the work they perform. The key to effectively measuring performance in terms of impact is correlating employee work-hours to specific projects aimed at achieving enterprise goals.


The beauty of this approach is that it enables a high degree of enterprise agility. Individual employees and even entire teams can self-organize around established objectives and then report how their work advanced those goals. This is the fundamental concept behind Objectives and Key Results (OKR) agile methodology.


But in order to effectively manage OKR workflows, you need something more than a generic employee time keeping app. Whether you’re looking for a Hubstaff, Time Doctor, or Activtrak alternative, you need comprehensive employee performance tracking tools and data visualization features.

Manage Employee Time with Agility and Automated Reporting

With the right tech-enabled project management and productivity tools in place, enterprises can align employee performance to strategic business goals without having to micromanage every aspect of the employee experience. This helps teams share accountability for their work while enjoying credit for it as well.


Agile methodologies like the OKR method support employee creativity, increase their motivation and commitment, and enable self-management. Computer activity monitoring software takes on the burden of capturing employee productivity data and ensuring that team members produce value for the enterprise.


Organizations that deploy analytics-ready work tracking software can immediately generate insightful graphs and charts that show exactly how individual employees and teams are performing according to their stated objectives. 


Since the software generates employee productivity data automatically, the reporting process can occur in real-time. There is no need to wait for management to create monthly or annual performance reports – all the latest data is immediately available on demand.

Enable Automated Reporting for Remote and Hybrid Employees

Teams that deploy employee performance tracking tools to automate productivity reporting earn more than the ability to improve business agility and streamline project management. They also make it easier to onboard remote and hybrid employees with flexible work schedules without negatively impacting productivity.


Losing productivity is one of the primary concerns company leaders face when implementing remote and hybrid work solutions. Establishing agile, objective-based workflows and measuring performance according to the real-world impact of employee productivity mitigates that risk.


This kind of approach allows employees to approach their home office work the same way they’d approach work in the physical office. They know their productivity is being objectively measured, and they understand that the impact of their work is directly related to their performance.


As a result, productivity increases as employees dedicate their newly flexible work schedules towards achieving valuable business goals. Your distributed team members can achieve business goals without supervision or micromanagement while your work tracking software gathers data and generates reports on their productivity.


We’ve reserved a 7-day free trial for you….

Want your hybrid or remote team to be more productive?

Claim your free 7-Day full feature trial of Insightful today. Insightful’s actionable work insights make your team more productive, efficient and accountable.

Ready to Take Full Control Of Your Workplace?

Try the simplest solution today…

Start Free Trial
Productivity and Efficiency Improvements

How to Make Productivity Reporting Dead Simple (and Incredibly Effective)

Written by
Austin Mitchell
Published on
November 26, 2021

Embrace automation to make your productivity reporting processes more effective and objective.

Productivity reports are a bottom-line necessity for successfully managing your workforce. Leaders, managers, and stakeholders need clear data on how employees handle the workloads given to them.


Prior to today’s digitally-enabled, hyper-connected work environment, productivity reporting was a time-consuming manual process. Analog punch clocks were considered effective employee performance tracking tools, and employees would clock in and out every single day.


Now, organizations have a wide variety of work tracking software options available, but a surprising number of leaders still rely on intuition and subjective monthly or annual assessments to gauge productivity.


At the same time, enterprises have radically upgraded their technological infrastructure in other areas of the business. Digital transformation has led to incredible improvements in workplace efficiency. It’s time productivity reporting made the jump, too.


Not All Productivity Metrics are Equal

There are many different ways to measure productivity, depending on the type of work being done. In some cases it’s even possible to measure the same kind of work in different ways, and the choices you make can deeply impact your eventual reporting capabilities.


Let’s take a developer, for example. Some of the ways that organizations traditionally measure a developer’s productive output include:


  • Number of Commits
  • Lines of code written
  • Number of pull requests made
  • Number of velocity points achieved
  • “Impact”


All of these measurements have their advantages and drawbacks. For example: 


  • Measuring by commits incentivizes developers to work quickly, but that can lead to bugs and errors that would otherwise have been caught before they were introduced into the system.
  • Measuring developer productivity by lines of code written is good for determining the size of your software system and understanding how the codebase is changing, but encourages developers to write large, unwieldy applications in inefficient ways.
  • Measuring productivity by pull requests encourages developers to think small, since this metric doesn’t factor the size or effort required. Developers may start prioritizing small, easy-to-code features over large, strategic core functionalities.
  • Velocity point requirements require managers to size projects before the work is completed, which makes it imprecise. This undermines the utility of estimating project value in the first place, since developers will earn based on the estimate, rather than the finished job.
  • Impact is difficult to define and measure at an organizational level or across organizations. One team may define “impact” differently than another.


Despite the challenges it represents, impact remains the best option for accurately assessing the value of employee productivity. In order to get it right, managers must establish the right metrics from the start and then deploy technology that automates the challenging and time-consuming process of granular, personalized productivity reporting across large teams.

Establish Productivity Metrics That Truly Measure Impact

The concept behind measuring “impact” is a good one, but it’s difficult to do without using automated work tracking software. This is because the average employee monitoring tool doesn’t gather or provide enough data to make “impact” a measurable performance indicator.


The ideal impact of any employee’s work refers to the actual dollar-value of the work they perform. The key to effectively measuring performance in terms of impact is correlating employee work-hours to specific projects aimed at achieving enterprise goals.


The beauty of this approach is that it enables a high degree of enterprise agility. Individual employees and even entire teams can self-organize around established objectives and then report how their work advanced those goals. This is the fundamental concept behind Objectives and Key Results (OKR) agile methodology.


But in order to effectively manage OKR workflows, you need something more than a generic employee time keeping app. Whether you’re looking for a Hubstaff, Time Doctor, or Activtrak alternative, you need comprehensive employee performance tracking tools and data visualization features.

Manage Employee Time with Agility and Automated Reporting

With the right tech-enabled project management and productivity tools in place, enterprises can align employee performance to strategic business goals without having to micromanage every aspect of the employee experience. This helps teams share accountability for their work while enjoying credit for it as well.


Agile methodologies like the OKR method support employee creativity, increase their motivation and commitment, and enable self-management. Computer activity monitoring software takes on the burden of capturing employee productivity data and ensuring that team members produce value for the enterprise.


Organizations that deploy analytics-ready work tracking software can immediately generate insightful graphs and charts that show exactly how individual employees and teams are performing according to their stated objectives. 


Since the software generates employee productivity data automatically, the reporting process can occur in real-time. There is no need to wait for management to create monthly or annual performance reports – all the latest data is immediately available on demand.

Enable Automated Reporting for Remote and Hybrid Employees

Teams that deploy employee performance tracking tools to automate productivity reporting earn more than the ability to improve business agility and streamline project management. They also make it easier to onboard remote and hybrid employees with flexible work schedules without negatively impacting productivity.


Losing productivity is one of the primary concerns company leaders face when implementing remote and hybrid work solutions. Establishing agile, objective-based workflows and measuring performance according to the real-world impact of employee productivity mitigates that risk.


This kind of approach allows employees to approach their home office work the same way they’d approach work in the physical office. They know their productivity is being objectively measured, and they understand that the impact of their work is directly related to their performance.


As a result, productivity increases as employees dedicate their newly flexible work schedules towards achieving valuable business goals. Your distributed team members can achieve business goals without supervision or micromanagement while your work tracking software gathers data and generates reports on their productivity.