The Ultimate Guide for Managing Difficult Employees

In this article, we’re going to discuss:

• How to recognize when a difficult employee is disrupting work.
• Why focusing on impact over attitude creates clearer and less confrontational accountability.
• When to set boundaries, and how to know if coaching has reached its limit.
• How employee desktop monitoring software gives you the data to make confident and timely decisions.

You’ve got productivity tools, workflows, and expectations in place, yet one disruptive employee throws everything off. Conflict spreads, morale dips, and you waste hours chasing accountability that should be automatic.

It’s time to use employee monitoring software, not guesswork, to confidently manage difficult employees.
‍

Why It’s Crucial to Target Difficult Employee Behaviour 

You assign those deadlines, yet one team member always misses them. You roll out a new tool, and they resist the change. Everyone else adapts, but their behavior stalls progress. It’s beyond just being frustrating; it’s operational drag.

Difficult employees don’t just impact their own performance—they create ripple effects that disrupt focus, lower output, and drain team morale. The Harvard Business Review identifies several common difficult employee archetypes, each of which undermines progress in unique ways:

• The Pessimist: Constantly doubts new initiatives, sows negativity, and resists change, even when solutions are clear.
  
  
• The Passive-Aggressive Peer: Appears agreeable on the surface but subtly obstructs decisions, deadlines, or collaboration through indirect resistance.
  
  
• The Know-It-All: Dominates conversations, dismisses others' ideas, and creates friction by refusing feedback or alternate approaches.

No matter which archetype you're dealing with, early intervention is key. Ignoring these behaviors allows dysfunction to become the norm, driving up frustration, stalling progress, and ultimately costing far more than just time.

But the issue isn’t always personal. Sometimes, there can be a visibility gap. Without clear benchmarks or systems for monitoring employees, you can’t prove what’s slipping or why. And without hard data, you risk either micromanaging or missing the actual problem entirely.

How to Manage Difficult Employees

You’re not here to police personalities; you’re here to protect performance. Difficult employees become a problem when their behavior disrupts output, not just attitudes. 

McKinsey research indicates that 66% of employees report a decline in performance due to workplace incivility, with 80% losing work time worrying about these incidents and 63% spending time avoiding the offender.

This step-by-step framework gives you tactical control without overstepping, using real data to drive action.
‍

Step 1: Spot the Behavior, Not Just the Attitude

Focus on actions, not assumptions. Before jumping to conclusions about someone’s personality, pinpoint behaviors that impact performance.

Are they missing deadlines? Logging fewer hours than peers? Frequently idle during peak hours? These are objective and measurable patterns, not just irritations.

With employee desktop monitoring software, you can surface those patterns early. The dashboard highlights trends in active hours, idle time, and unproductive tool usage, helping you flag potential issues without micromanaging.

Say a top performer flags a “ghost” teammate. You check and see they’ve only logged four active hours a day—for two weeks straight—while claiming a full workload. Now you have facts, not friction, to guide your next step.
‍

Step 2: Label the Impact in Team Terms

You need to connect the behavior to something bigger than personality. It’s all about operational cost.

When approaching an issue, frame it in terms of delivery delays, missed targets, or extra workload on others. This keeps the conversation focused and reduces defensiveness. It also gives you a clean way to escalate when improvements don’t happen.

Don’t say “You’re difficult.” Say, “Your delayed updates caused a 2-day hold on the sprint.” Keep your language anchored in facts that affect the entire team. Behavior-based feedback also helps surface patterns that may point to workflow friction, giving you opportunities to optimize business processes while addressing individual issues.
‍

Step 3: Set Goals With Proof & Accountability

You need to define what success looks like and track whether it’s actually happening.

Set clear, measurable goals tied to specific behaviors: log 40 active hours per week, attend all scheduled standups, meet X deadline frequency. Then, use data to monitor progress consistently. This turns improvement into a shared target, not a personal dispute.

A good HR employee tracking software makes progress easy to visualize and share, turning goals into trackable benchmarks that are hard to ignore.

With Insightful (formerly Workplus), you can set baselines for attendance, focus time, and task engagement, then track weekly changes. When you set goals in-platform and see idle time drop , it’s no longer about judgment—it’s about results both parties can see.
‍

Step 4: Decide When It’s Time to Transition

You need to recognize when coaching has hit its limit.

If the data shows no improvement after clear goals, consistent feedback, and multiple check-ins, it’s time to escalate. Don’t let underperformance linger when your credibility and the team’s focus are at stake. Use documented evidence to support the case for reassignment, managed exit, or HR involvement.

This isn’t about giving up. It’s about protecting the work. When one person consistently drains time, trust, or momentum, despite clear goals and multiple interventions, keeping them sends the wrong signal to everyone else.

These moments are where workforce management becomes leadership.

Say three months in, your team is still covering for a chronic underperformer. But now you’re not relying on hearsay or gut instinct,  you’ve got the data! You share a clear performance timeline with HR, showing missed goals and stalled progress. The decision to part ways isn’t personal. It’s supported, necessary, and fair to the team that’s doing the work.
‍

Step 5: Analyze Patterns to Prevent Recurrence

You need to turn individual issues into teamwide improvements.

Once you've resolved or escalated a difficult employee case, don’t stop there. Look at broader signals—late logins across a team, drop-offs after tool changes, recurring idle spikes in specific workflows. These patterns show you where expectations are unclear or processes are breaking.

Tools like Insightful filter productivity data by team, time period, or work mode (remote, hybrid, in-office) to surface trendlines. Maybe a whole team drops in focus after 3 PM. Maybe absenteeism spikes during new project sprints. These insights help you optimize workflows, realign expectations, and avoid re-coaching the same issues in new people.

This step shifts you from reactive HR to operational leadership.
‍

Behavioural Issues or Workflow Gaps? Know the Difference

Sometimes it may feel personal: late logins, inconsistent work, missed deadlines. But what if it’s not a behavioural problem? 

Before labeling someone as “difficult,” ask yourself: Do I actually have the data to know?

If you’re not using software to track employee productivity, you're relying on gut checks and subjective observations. That’s where leadership missteps happen.

Without the right tools, you might overcorrect, micromanage, or escalate the issue unnecessarily. Or worse, you might miss the real issue entirely, like missing process delays or unclear expectations among employees.

With a workforce analytics platform like Insightful, you can determine whether behavior is really the blocker or if your system is setting people up to fail. By identifying patterns among employees, and consistent problem areas, this allows you to efficiently create resolutions.

This isn’t about blame. It’s about clarity. When you replace subjective observations with objective workforce intelligence, you can make justified decisions.
‍

FAQs

How can I tell if a difficult employee is an attitude or a management issue?

Check whether their behavior affects work outputs, such as multiple missed deadlines, excessive idle time, or poor handoffs.

With this list of best employee monitoring software, you can discover which workforce intelligence tool would work best for your company. By implementing these tools, you can distinguish between mood and measurable issues.

What’s the best way to give feedback to an underperforming employee without making it personal?

Focus on the result, not the attitude. Tie actions to specific, measurable impacts. For instance, if the attendance tracking software indicates a difficult employee’s consistent lack of participation and disengagement, it presents them with the real measured underperformance during evaluations.

You can even take it a step further and show your employee the impacts on the entire team’s productivity. That’s harder to argue with and easier to resolve.

How can I hold an employee accountable for improvement over time?

Use workforce intelligence to turn goals into data points. Use a tool like Insightful to start tracking team time to see where focus is lost, delays begin, and how performance really plays out. This way, clear expectations can be formed.

When should a manager decide to let a difficult employee go?

If expectations are clear, tracked, and unmet despite support, you’re past the point of coaching. At that stage, the cost of keeping them is higher than the transition cost. Productivity insights from Insightful help validate that decision with data, not just frustration. 
‍

Common Mistakes That Undermine Progress

Even the best managers can fall into traps that stall team performance. Without clear data, consistent expectations, or timely intervention, small issues compound into serious friction. Here are the most common missteps—and how to avoid them with more visibility and structure.
‍

• You confront personality, not performance. Calling someone “toxic” or “lazy” invites conflict. Focus on concrete behaviors: missed deadlines, idle time, or skipped check-ins. Keep the conversation grounded.
  
  
• You skip the data. Without visibility into time use or app activity, you rely on gut feeling. This leads to bias, blind spots, or inconsistent management.
  
  
• You delay hard conversations. Hoping they’ll change on their own only lets friction spread. Every week you wait, the team adapts to dysfunction.
  
  
• You make exceptions without clarity. Allowing one person to skip meetings or underdeliver without explanation signals that standards are flexible—or optional.
  
  
• You assume everyone knows what “good” looks like. Vague expectations lead to vague results. Use performance data and time goals to define “done” clearly and objectively.
  
  
• You overlook remote employee patterns. Without remote employee monitoring, disengagement can go unnoticed, especially when presence isn’t tied to results.
  ‍

From Conflict to Clarity

When you manage difficult employees with data, structure, and timely intervention, you stop guessing and start leading. The right visibility turns tension into improvement or into a confident decision.

• Track attendance, time, and task ownership with Insightful’s productivity data
  
  
• Use real-time metrics to support HR decisions and coaching conversations
  
  
• Start a 7-day free trial or book a demo to see Insightful in action.

‍

Updated on: June 4th, 2025

‍